Reports are spreading on sites and blogs across the Internet of an audio problem in which the stereo mix function is disabled in some newer PCs with Sigmatel sound cards – most notably Dells. While the issue is not a new one one, the talk is now centered on the question of why. Users are now putting the blame on the most hated organization in America, the RIAA.
According to these reports, the problem may not be a driver glitch, but intentional crippling of the audio by Dell and possibly several other OEMs that build their computers with these sound cards. The reason? Alleged appeasement of the RIAA.
The stereo mix feature is necessary for audio recording applications. This includes the creation of original recordings as well as duplication of existing audio. It also includes the use of certain applications such as Skype.
The chronic problem has fueled recent rumours of possible collusion between major OEMs (especially Dell) and the RIAA, suggesting the latter, known for its aggressive anti-piracy stance and numerous lawsuits against end users both young and old alike, is pressuring Dell and other companies to disable the feature to deter piracy. Although neither Dell nor the RIAA have stepped up to confirm nor deny the allegations, such silence seems to have only fueled the concept of conspiracy by the RIAA to intentionally disable audio recording capability or control it.
If this is true, the RIAA, and possibly the OEMs as well, have clearly crossed the line. Aside from the dangers of collusion there is the issue of the rights of property owners. Commercial software companies like Microsoft may be able to get away with controlling the use of an operating system or application by the force of their license agreements but users still own the hardware itself and have the right to use it as they choose. To attempt to cripple, disable or otherwise deny access to or the use of the user’s own property, namely the PC, is very serious and needs to be addressed.
To sell a crippled PC out of the box without notification could invite lawsuits. To intentionally sabotage someone’s property could be considered criminal. If allowed, it could set a dangerous precedent against personal property and privacy rights.
Is there some truth to these allegations or is it merely conjecture on the part of angry and frustrated users? There seems to be no definitive proof either way. However, it needs to be investigated quickly, if not to confront the question, then at least to stop the rumours and put the issue to rest.
